The Role of Catheter-Directed CT-Angiography in Radioembolisation.

Radioembolisation is an established transarterial therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver metastasis. Success of radioembolisation depends on meticulous angiography and accurate dosimetry. Intra-procedure catheter-directed CT-angiography is commonly performed to improve the efficacy and safety of radioembolisation. This review article will (1) introduce the differences between cone beam CT and hybrid angiography-CT, and (2) describe the benefits of catheter-directed CT-angiography in radioembolisation from both an interventional radiology and nuclear medicine perspective.

Drug Coated Balloons for Dysfunctional Haemodialysis Venous Access: A Patient Level Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: To perform an individual patient data level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials comparing drug coated balloon angioplasty (DCB) against conventional percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) in the treatment of dysfunctional haemodialysis venous access. METHODS: A search was conducted from inception to 13 November 2020. Kaplan-Meier curves comparing DCB with PTA by target lesion primary patency (TLPP) and access circuit primary patency (ACPP) were graphically reconstructed to retrieve patient level data. One stage meta-analyses with Cox models with random effects shared frailties were conducted to determine hazard ratios (HRs). Dynamic restricted mean survival times (RMST) were conducted in view of violation of the proportional hazards assumption. Conventional two stage meta-analyses and network meta-analyses under random effects Frequentist models were conducted to determine overall and comparative outcomes of paclitaxel concentrations used. Where outliers were consistently detected through outlier and influence analyses, sensitivity analyses excluding those studies were conducted. RESULTS: Among 10 RCTs (1 207 patients), HRs across all models favoured DCB (one stage shared frailty HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.53 - 0.73, p < .001; two stage random effects HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.42 - 0.86, p = .018, I2 = 65%) for TLPP. Evidence of time varying effects (p = .005) was found. TLPP RMST was + 3.54 months (25.0%) longer in DCB treated patients compared with PTA (p = .001) at three years. TLPP at six months, one year, and two years was 75.3% vs. 58.1%, 51.1% vs. 37.1%, and 31.4% vs. 26.0% for DCB and PTA, respectively. The P-Scores within the Frequentist network meta-analysis suggest that higher concentrations of paclitaxel were associated with better TLPP and ACPP. Among six RCTs (854 patients), the one stage model favoured DCB (shared frailty HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60 - 0.87, p < .001) for ACPP. Conversely, the two stage random effects model demonstrated no significant difference (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.35 - 1.67, p = .41, I2 = 81%). Sensitivity analysis excluding outliers significantly favoured DCB (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.41 - 0.91, p = .027, I2 = 62%). CONCLUSION: Overall evidence suggests that DCB is favoured over PTA in TLPP and ACPP.

A survey of anxiety and burnout in the radiology workforce of a tertiary hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic.

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to study anxiety and burnout among Division of Radiological Sciences (RADSC) staff during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify potential risk and protective factors. These outcomes were compared with non-RADSC staff. METHODS: A cross-sectional online study was conducted between 12 March and 20 July 2020 in the largest public tertiary hospital receiving COVID-19 cases. Burnout and anxiety were assessed with the Physician Work-Life Scale and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale, respectively. Workplace factors were examined as potential risk and protective factors using multivariable ordinary least squares regression analyses, adjusting for pertinent demographic characteristics. RESULTS: RADSC staff (n = 180) and non-RADSC staff (n = 1458) demonstrated moderate-to-severe anxiety rates of 6.7 and 13.2 % and burnout rates of 17.8 and 23.9 %, respectively. RADSC staff reported significantly lower anxiety (mean ± SD: 4.0 ± 3.7 vs 4.9 ± 4.5; P-value < 0.05), burnout (mean ± SD: 1.9 ± 0.7 vs 2.1 ± 0.8; P-value < 0.01), increased teamwork (82.2% vs 74.1%; P-value < 0.05) and fewer night shifts (36.7% vs 41.1%; P-value < 0.01). Among RADSC staff, higher job dedication was associated with lower anxiety (b (95% CI) = -0.28 (-0.45, -0.11)) and burnout (b (95% CI) = -0.07 (-0.11,-0.04)), while longer than usual working hours was associated with increased anxiety (b (95% CI) = 1.42 (0.36, 2.45)) and burnout (b (95% CI) = 0.28 (0.09, 0.48)). CONCLUSIONS: A proportion of RADSC staff reported significant burnout and anxiety, although less compared to the larger hospital cohort. Measures to prevent longer than usual work hours and increase feelings of enthusiasm and pride in one's job may further reduce the prevalence of anxiety problems and burnout in radiology departments.

Management of arterial dissections in 12 patients during transarterial chemoembolization and yttrium-90 selective internal radiotherapy for primary and secondary liver tumours.

OBJECTIVE: To describe rates and management strategies of arterial dissections in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and Yttrium-90 selective internal radiotherapy (90Y SIRT) for primary and secondary liver tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective review included 1377 hepatic angiographies between May 2010 and June 2015 in a single centre for TACE and 90Y SIRT of liver tumours. The angiogram results, management, treatment outcomes and follow-up angiography/imaging findings were recorded. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Twelve cases of arterial dissections (12/1377, 0.87%) were documented. Three dissections (3/633, 0.47%) occurred during TACE, seven (7/449, 1.56%) during pre-treatment planning angiographies (PTPA) for 90Y SIRT, and two (2/249, 0.80%) during the treatment procedure of 90Y SIRT. The preferred management strategy was to manoeuvre past the dissection and complete the procedure, which was achieved in six patients (50%). Angioplasty with stenting was performed in one patient. In three patients, the procedure was held off for up to 3 months to allow the dissection to heal before repeating the procedure. A dissection that occurred during PTPA was detected only when the patient returned for 90Y SIRT. PTPA was immediately repeated for this patient. The last patient opted for sorafenib. Residual 50% stenosis was seen in one patient on follow-up hepatic angiography, but he was otherwise asymptomatic. In the remaining patients, no residual dissection or clinical sequelae was observed on follow-up. CONCLUSION: Arterial dissection is a rare but important complication of transarterial locoregional therapy. Where possible, attempts should be made at completing the therapy. Deferring treatment can be considered as dissections usually heal within 3 months. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, case series.

Repurposing the power injectable peripherally inserted central catheter as a tunnelled, non-cuffed, centrally inserted central venous catheter in oncological patients for short- to mid-term vascular access: A pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Usual short- to mid-term vascular accesses for oncologic patients include the peripherally inserted central catheter and non-tunnelled centrally inserted central catheters, inserted in the supraclavicular or infraclavicular area. Peripherally inserted central catheters can be restrictive in active patients; supraclavicular non-tunnelled centrally inserted central catheters are not ideal in terms of exit site location and cosmesis, while infraclavicular non-tunnelled centrally inserted central catheters may be associated with puncture-related complications. In this pilot study, we have evaluated the off-label use of peripherally inserted central catheters as a tunnelled supraclavicular centrally inserted central catheter. METHODS: Ten patients were recruited for this prospective study. A non-cuffed, power injectable peripherally inserted central catheter was inserted via a short subcutaneous tunnel into the internal jugular vein using the peel-away sheath and introducer as a tunneller. Puncture wounds were closed with tissue glue. Patients were followed up for comfort scores, dwell time and complications. RESULTS: The median dwell time was 94 days (mean of 113 days). One catheter was removed due to systemic fungemia, resulting in an acceptable complication rate of 0.97 per 1000 catheter days.Mean patient-reported comfort scores was 16 (out of 20). Pressurised injections for computer tomography imaging were performed in five patients without complications. CONCLUSION: Despite limited numbers, this method appears to be safe and well accepted with low complication rates. This modified vascular access is low profile, easily concealed, readily removable and compatible with pressure injector and uses a commonly found catheter in a modified fashion. Larger prospective trials will be needed to ascertain if it can be a standard of care for oncological patients.

Letter to the editor: Comment on a case report of thermal injury to spinal cord, a rare complication of percutaneous microwave spine tumour ablation.

Microwave ablation of the spine is an effective treatment option for patients with symptomatic osseous metastases. It is an increasingly common procedure in clinical practice and can be performed in conjunction with other procedures such as vertebroplasty and nerve root blocks. Multiple studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of the percutaneous ablation; however potential complications can arise. Thermal injury to the spinal cord is a rare but serious known complication which has severe consequences to the patient. Multiple strategies can be adopted to reduce the rate of complications. We aim to discuss the various technical considerations when performing percutaneous ablation of spinal tumours to decrease the risks of complications.